4 August 2025

Top 10 Critical WordPress Vulnerabilities of July 2025 and How to Secure Your Site

Discover the top 10 critical WordPress vulnerabilities (CVEs) disclosed in July 2025, including plugin flaws and RCE risks. Learn how to protect your site and how Quttera, a leading cybersecurity company, helps keep WordPress websites malware-free and secure. Quttera offers a range of security solutions, including malware detection and removal, website firewall, and file upload vulnerability protection, all designed to mitigate the risks posed by these vulnerabilities.
Introduction
The month of July 2025 has underscored the urgent and evolving nature of cybersecurity threats faced by WordPress website owners and administrators. As the world's most popular content management system, WordPress powers over 40% of all websites globally, making it a lucrative target for cybercriminals who continuously probe for weaknesses.

Ten vulnerabilities were publicly disclosed in this particularly alarming stretch, each carrying a CVSS score greater than 9.0, designating them as critically severe. These flaws affected various plugins and themes, many widely used, leaving countless websites exposed to potential attacks.
Understanding the Vulnerabilities and Their Impact
The common thread running through these vulnerabilities lies in their ability to be exploited remotely, often without requiring authentication. Attackers, armed with sophisticated techniques and sometimes with only a browser and a crafted request, could upload arbitrary files, inject malicious code, or perform privilege escalation attacks. In some cases, all it took was tricking an administrator into clicking a link to initiate a full site compromise. The implications of such vulnerabilities are dire: websites can be defaced, sensitive data can be exfiltrated, backdoors can be installed, or entire servers can be converted into botnet nodes. For business-critical sites, such outcomes disrupt operations and can result in reputational damage, customer trust erosion, and legal ramifications depending on the jurisdiction and nature of data involved.

Take, for instance, the flaw identified in the Ovatheme Events Manager Plugin, catalogued as CVE-2025-32510. This vulnerability was scored the maximum 10.0 due to its ability to allow the unrestricted upload of malicious file types. Attackers could upload a PHP-based webshell and gain complete access to the underlying server. No special privileges or access tokens were necessary, making exploitation trivial for anyone aware of the flaw. Once uploaded, these scripts serve as command-and-control interfaces, letting attackers manipulate server files, access databases, or even pivot deeper into network infrastructure.

Similarly severe was CVE-2025-5394, found in the Alone Theme. Here, the absence of proper capability checks in the plugin installer allowed unauthorized users to upload ZIP files containing rogue plugins. Once unpacked and activated, these malicious plugins would provide adversaries with full control of the WordPress environment. The same theme suffered from a parallel flaw registered as CVE-2025-4394, which highlighted another path through which plugin installation could be exploited—demonstrating that weaknesses in one theme's logic could manifest in multiple distinct yet equally dangerous attack vectors.

FluentSnippets Plugin, affected by CVE-2025-54010, illustrates a different flavor of risk, where attackers do not necessarily need to interface with server files directly. Instead, this vulnerability enabled cross-site request forgery (CSRF), exploiting user trust. An attacker could craft a malicious link and lure an admin to click it. Doing so would trigger backend actions that executed harmful snippets. While requiring some social engineering, this attack is potent due to its invisibility and stealth, making detection and remediation more complicated for untrained users.

Other vulnerabilities in the list highlight a disturbing trend of insecure input handling and inadequate user privilege enforcement. CVE-2025-7340 and CVE-2025-7437 both enabled unauthenticated file uploads. In these scenarios, threat actors could upload non-image files—usually disguised as benign documents—which became executable on the server. The issue here isn't just the upload mechanism; these plugins lacked basic validation to distinguish between safe content and potentially harmful scripts. If combined with poorly configured file permissions, the uploaded content could be executed, turning what may appear to be a minor issue into a full-scale breach.

CVE-2025-7360, another flaw within the HT Contact Form Widget Plugin, operated differently. Rather than uploading malicious content, this vulnerability allowed attackers to perform path traversal operations. By manipulating the destination path of file functions, an attacker could overwrite critical files, such as wp-config.php, effectively reconfiguring the website or rendering it inaccessible. The implications are broad and complex, from injecting backdoors to initiating full denial-of-service conditions.

One of the more technically intricate vulnerabilities was CVE-2025-7696, found in the Pipedrive Integration Plugin. It stemmed from insecure data deserialization, leading to what is known as PHP object injection. Through specially crafted payloads, an attacker could manipulate backend logic, delete key configuration files, or even gain shell access, depending on the payload's structure. This vulnerability is particularly challenging to defend against without deeply inspecting application logic and employing secure serialization techniques.

In the Bears Backup Plugin, CVE-2025-5396 reflected another recurring theme: missing or broken access controls. AJAX functions meant to be limited to authenticated users were left open, allowing unauthenticated actors to trigger sensitive processes such as initiating backups or writing files. Combined with other vectors, such flaws can create attack chains that elevate the initial impact substantially.

Even legacy codebases weren't spared. CVE-2015-10135, though old in origin, was only patched and made public in July 2025. Found in the WPshop 2 Plugin, this vulnerability allowed executable files to be uploaded without restriction. It's belated disclosure emphasizes a critical lesson in web security: code assumed to be safe due to age or long-term use may still harbor latent flaws that, when rediscovered, place entire ecosystems at risk.
Protecting WordPress Websites Against Critical Threats
Understanding how these vulnerabilities work is essential to grasp their severity. Many exploit foundational assumptions made during plugin and theme development. Developers often fail to anticipate how seemingly minor coding oversights—like not verifying MIME types or relying on unfiltered user input—can be transformed into devastating attacks. Remote code execution typically hinges on the attacker's ability to write or execute files on the server. File upload flaws serve this function readily, while CSRF or deserialization issues create indirect yet equally potent avenues. In each case, the attacker aims to escalate their influence from an outsider to a privileged user or admin, ideally without raising alarms.

This underscores the need for a comprehensive, multi-layered security approach.

Defending WordPress sites requires a proactive and comprehensive approach, given the pervasiveness of such threats. Website administrators must go beyond the basics of installing antivirus plugins or depending solely on the hosting provider's security. Ensuring that all components are updated regularly is non-negotiable. Vulnerabilities like those discussed here are most commonly patched by their maintainers soon after discovery. However, this only benefits users who keep their software current. The longer an outdated plugin remains active on a site, the higher the chance it will be exploited, especially if exploit code becomes publicly available.

Restricting file uploads is another critical defense measure. Accepting only necessary file types and validating them using extension checks and MIME type inspection can block many exploit attempts. This must be supported by storing uploads outside web-accessible directories, limiting the chance of direct execution.

Equally vital is the use of application-layer protections such as a Web Application Firewall (WAF). A WAF sits between the site and its visitors, monitoring and filtering traffic. It can block known attack patterns, rate-limit suspicious behaviors, and even apply virtual patches to temporarily mitigate zero-day vulnerabilities. This is especially important when a plugin developer is slow to respond or when the site relies on legacy code for which no updates are forthcoming.

Security is not solely a matter of prevention—it also demands vigilance. Website scans should be run routinely to detect malicious code, unauthorized file changes, or defaced pages. These scans must go beyond surface-level checks and include heuristic analysis to spot obfuscated payloads and behavior-based anomalies. Coupling this with file integrity monitoring allows administrators to be alerted instantly when critical files are changed, providing an opportunity to act before further damage is done.

A robust backup strategy also acts as a final line of defense. Regular, encrypted backups stored offsite allow websites to be restored quickly following an incident. However, backups are only helpful if adequately maintained and tested periodically. A backup that fails during recovery is no better than no backup.

Incorporating detailed logs and audit trails also enables better forensics after an incident. Knowing which user initiated an upload, what IP address they connected from, or what changes were made to which files provides invaluable insight during response and recovery. It also serves a compliance function for organizations subject to data protection regulations.
Conclusion
The surge in critical WordPress vulnerabilities during July 2025 highlights the urgent need for constant cybersecurity awareness. Widely used themes and plugins can become significant security risks if not regularly updated or secured. These vulnerabilities show how a single weakness can lead to full site compromise, reinforcing the importance of prompt patching and a proactive defense strategy.

Here at Quttera, we help address this challenge with smart, layered protection tailored for WordPress. Its malware scanner detects common and advanced threats, using behavioral analysis to catch what others miss. The Web Application Firewall blocks attacks in real time and offers virtual patching before official fixes become available. When a site is compromised, our incident response team removes malware, handles blocklist issues, and provides clear recovery guidance.

Quttera includes file integrity monitoring and real-time alerts for unauthorized changes to safeguard websites further. This ensures threats are caught early and stopped before spreading. Altogether, Quttera empowers site owners to stay online, secure, and focused on growth—even in the face of evolving threats.